ME: "Hi, I"m calling to see if you have my son's RAST test results back. It's been a couple of weeks since we were in."
NURSE: "Sure, let me check. Which lab did the blood draw?"
NURSE: "We don't do blood draws here. Remember -- we gave you a lab order -- "
(She has to stop at this point because I've started laughing uncontrollably.)
NURSE: "Heidi? Is that you pimping me again? HEIDI?"
ME: "No, no, I'm sorry, I really am a parent. I just started laughing because I realized we never had the blood drawn. I'm so sorry!"
NURSE (long pause): "Um...o.k....I just thought it had to be the girl at the front desk again, teasing me. I mean, who calls for lab results when they haven't even - " (stops, as she realizes there's no way she can finish this sentence without letting me know what a complete IDIOT she thinks I am.)
ME: "Well, thanks! I'll obviously call back after we do the blood draw."
So that's how it's been going. My son did see his allergist and they did do SPT:
7/30 (about as bad as last time)
So...good and bad here. He's never had a completely non-reactive soy test. If the RAST comes back as promising, we'll probably do a soy challenge in the office in a month or two.
Hazelnut was an interesting conversation. The doctor agreed with my assessment that this is probably a pollen cross-reaction. She suggested an IOFC, rather than bothering with component testing, if the RAST is at a reasonable level.
Peanut was a shocker. If you remember, we actually had difficulty qualifying for the FAHF-2 food challenge because my son's RAST and SPT were borderline low for what they would accept. His peanut went from 3.5 during the challenge to a rather large 9 this time around. His allergist shrugged and said "well, you fed him peanut. That makes the numbers go up."
So does that mean he's more sensitized to peanut because the number went up? Honestly -- the more we've done RAST testing over the years, the more useless it's seemed to me. His RAST and SPT for green pea were (and still are) negative, and yet he failed that challenge, so clearly testing isn't everything.
I've actually toyed with the idea of sending his baked milk dose in his lunch. Our in-school nurse is very good and very interested in his clinical trial. I have a feeling she would be willing to be on-call if we wanted to risk doing this on her watch. But that seems a little far to go, even to speed up this process.
The bottom line is that I have a HUGE amount of empathy for the kids and parents in these OIT trials, where a daily dose is absolutely mandatory. My son missed at least two doses of FAHF-2 over the course of the trial. It was extraordinarily difficult to ensure every single dose was taken. (Granted: it was 3 doses a day, but even 1 dose every day is difficult.) If his desensitization had depended on my/his perfect compliance, we would have been in big trouble.
"So...if things go well, he may come to school with a lot fewer restrictions." The guy just looked at me and blinked. Clearly, they just want to know what to feed him and what not to feed him. This whole "maybe, sort-of, a little" business made both of us uneasy. How will he do baked milk at school, unless he's able to start eating it in everything?
My son doesn't seem to have much interest in experimenting with milk-containing foods. He's definitely not an equal partner yet in pushing for new foods/higher tolerance. I think he just doesn't see his restrictions as that big a deal.
Who really needs to let go here?
Follow me on Facebook or Twitter